Rupnagar

Boundaries based on the 2001 census. Read about our methodology.


Key statistics for documented cases in Rupnagar District

Victim Demographics 

Gender

94.6% Male 105
 
 
5.4% Female 6

Marital status

48.6% Not married 54
 
 
50.5% Married 56

If married, did the victim have children?

45.9% Yes 51
 
 
3.6% No 4


Total children surviving victims: 132


Religion

98.2% Sikh 109
 
 
1.8% Non-Sikh 2

Caste

49.5% Jat 55
 
 
45.0% Non-Jat 50

Age

3.6% 0-17 4
 
75.7% 18-33 84
 
9.0% 34-49 10
 
1.8% 50-64 2
 
5.4% 65+ 6
 
4.5% Age unknown 5
 

Education

15.3% No education 17
 
9.9% Primary school 11
 
12.6% Middle school 14
 
45.0% High school 50
 
6.3% Some college 7
 
5.4% College degree 6
 
0.9% Vocational degree 1
 

Employment

23.4% Farmer/agriculture 26
 
10.8% Student 12
 
9.0% Driver (bus/truck/car) 10
 
7.2% Day labourer 8
 
5.4% Mechanic 6
 
4.5% Unemployed 5
 
3.6% Shopkeeper 4
 
3.6% Housewife 4
 
1.8% Carpenter 2
 
37.8% Other 42
 

Urban / Rural

89.2% Rural 99
 
 
10.8% Urban 12

Abduction, Detention, & Torture 

Prior detentions

47.7% Yes 53
 
 
47.7% No 53

Prior torture

38.7% Yes 43
 
 
9.0% No 10

Abduction preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

69.4% Yes 77
 
 
24.3% No 27

Security officials informed witnesses where they were taking the victim

12.1% Yes 7
 
 
70.7% No 41

Witnesses to abduction

52.3% Yes 58
 
 
5.4% No 6

Victim abduction location

21.6% Victim’s residence 24
 
4.5% Village fields 5
 
4.5% Shop/market 5
 
3.6% Friend/relative's residence 4
 
3.6% Roadside 4
 
3.6% Bus station/stand 4
 
2.7% Checkpoint (naka) 3
 
1.8% Police station 2
 
15.3% Other 17
 

Detention facility type

Data forthcoming


Preceding detention location known

40.5% Yes 45
 
 
28.8% No 32

Witnesses to detention preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

Data forthcoming


Security official response to victim status

15.3% Gave no response 17
 
12.6% Denied involvement 14
 
7.2% Killed victim in an “encounter” 8
 
7.2% Told family to go to another police station 8
 
7.2% Other 8
 
4.5% Victim had escaped 5
 
2.7% Admitted custody only 3
 
0.9% Admitted extrajudicial execution with no explanation 1
 

Victim presented before judge/magistrate

2.7% Yes 3
 
 
58.6% No 65

Enforced Disappearances vs. Extrajudicial Executions 

Classification

74.8% Extrajudicial executions 83
 
 
25.2% Enforced disappearances 28

Number of victims per family

77.5% 1 victim 86
 
14.4% 2 victim 16
 
5.4% 3 victim 6
 
2.7% 4 victim 3
 

Related incidents

8.1% Genuine encounters in family 9
 
 
87.4% No genuine encounters in family 97

Body Disposal 

Security forces returned body

26.1% Yes 29
 
4.5% Yes, but forced immediate cremation 5
 
43.2% No 48
 

Body disposal by security forces

13.5% Cremated the body 15
 
0.9% Dumped body in canal or river 1
 

Condition of corpse, if known

19.8% Bullet wounds 22
 
7.2% Other 8
 
4.5% Bruises 5
 
3.6% Cuts/wounds 4
 
3.6% Missing hair from head or face 4
 
2.7% Burn marks 3
 
1.8% Missing fingernails 2
 
0.9% Broken bones 1
 

Security Forces Implicated 

Names of involved security officials known

57.7% Yes 64
 
 
17.1% No 19

Security forces uniformed

75.9% Yes 44
 
 
19.0% No 11

Type(s) of security forces involved in abduction

60.4% Punjab Police 67
 
9.0% Criminal Investigation Agency 10
 
7.2% Other 8
 
5.4% CRPF 6
 
2.7% Cat 3
 

Type(s) of security forces involved in extrajudicial execution

63.1% Punjab police 70
 
10.8% Other 12
 
7.2% Criminal Investigation Agency 8
 
6.3% CRPF 7
 
4.5% Cat 5
 
0.9% BSF 1
 

Militancy Involvement 

Militant status

31.5% Militant 35
 
 
57.7% Non-militant 64

Non-militant, provided support to militants

9.0% Yes 10
 
 
45.0% No 50

If provided support, support was voluntary

8.1% Yes 9
 
 
0.9% No 1

Remedies & Impact 

Approached court or commission

30.6% Yes 34
 
 
68.5% No 76

Approached security officials

36.9% Yes 41
 
 
63.1% No 70

Reason the family did not pursue any kind of action

55.9% Afraid of retaliation 62
 
21.6% Couldn’t afford 24
 
18.9% Didn’t know what to do 21
 
12.6% Believed it would have been ineffective 14
 
9.9% Not applicable 11
 
1.8% Other 2
 

Remedies desired from government

71.2% Truth commission 79
 
67.6% Monetary compensation to family 75
 
63.1% Employment 70
 
31.5% Rehabilitation services to family members 35
 
20.7% Criminal sanctions against those responsible 23
 
18.0% Investigations into abuses 20
 
14.4% Public acknowledgement of wrongful deaths 16
 
5.4% Memorial for victims 6
 
1.8% Desire nothing from government 2
 
0.9% Other 1
 

Year & District 

District

100.0% Rupnagar 111
 

Year

0.0% 1981 0
 
0.0% 1982 0
 
0.0% 1983 0
 
0.0% 1984 0
 
0.9% 1985 1
 
0.9% 1986 1
 
0.0% 1987 0
 
2.7% 1988 3
 
5.4% 1989 6
 
2.7% 1990 3
 
29.7% 1991 33
 
32.4% 1992 36
 
11.7% 1993 13
 
6.3% 1994 7
 
3.6% 1995 4
 
0.0% 1996 0
 
0.0% 1997 0
 
0.0% 1998 0
 
0.9% 1999 1
 
0.0% 2000 0
 
0.0% 2001 0
 
0.0% 2002 0
 
0.0% 2003 0
 
0.0% 2004 0
 
0.0% 2005 0
 
0.0% 2006 0
 
0.0% 2007 0
 
0.0% 2012 0
 
2.7% Year Unknown 3