Bathinda

Boundaries based on the 2001 census. Read about our methodology.


142 documented cases in Bathinda District


Key statistics for documented cases in Bathinda District

Victim Demographics 

Gender

99.3% Male 141
 
 
0.7% Female 1

Marital status

57.7% Not married 82
 
 
41.5% Married 59

If married, did the victim have children?

33.1% Yes 47
 
 
5.6% No 8


Total children surviving victims: 123


Religion

96.5% Sikh 137
 
 
3.5% Non-Sikh 5

Caste

58.5% Jat 83
 
 
40.1% Non-Jat 57

Age

7.7% 0-17 11
 
73.9% 18-33 105
 
12.7% 34-49 18
 
2.8% 50-64 4
 
2.1% 65+ 3
 
0.7% Age unknown 1
 

Education

24.6% No education 35
 
17.6% Primary school 25
 
10.6% Middle school 15
 
34.5% High school 49
 
4.2% Some college 6
 
2.8% College degree 4
 
1.4% Graduate degree 2
 
2.8% Vocational degree 4
 

Employment

41.5% Farmer/agriculture 59
 
12.7% Day labourer 18
 
9.2% Student 13
 
5.6% Unemployed 8
 
4.9% Driver (bus/truck/car) 7
 
4.2% Shopkeeper 6
 
0.7% Mechanic 1
 
0.7% Housewife 1
 
26.8% Other 38
 

Urban / Rural

87.3% Rural 124
 
 
12.7% Urban 18

Abduction, Detention, & Torture 

Prior detentions

52.1% Yes 74
 
 
46.5% No 66

Prior torture

33.1% Yes 47
 
 
19.0% No 27

Abduction preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

81.0% Yes 115
 
 
12.7% No 18

Security officials informed witnesses where they were taking the victim

18.6% Yes 19
 
 
71.6% No 73

Witnesses to abduction

71.8% Yes 102
 
 
3.5% No 5

Victim abduction location

26.1% Victim’s residence 37
 
11.3% Friend/relative's residence 16
 
8.5% Roadside 12
 
7.7% Village fields 11
 
4.9% Bus station/stand 7
 
4.2% Police station 6
 
2.1% Shop/market 3
 
1.4% Checkpoint (naka) 2
 
0.7% Village drain 1
 
9.2% Other 13
 

Detention facility type

Data forthcoming


Preceding detention location known

38.7% Yes 55
 
 
42.3% No 60

Witnesses to detention preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

Data forthcoming


Security official response to victim status

19.7% Gave no response 28
 
16.9% Told family to go to another police station 24
 
5.6% Admitted extrajudicial execution with no explanation 8
 
4.2% Other 6
 
3.5% Victim had escaped 5
 
2.8% Killed victim in an “encounter” 4
 
2.8% Denied involvement 4
 
1.4% Admitted custody only 2
 
0.7% Victim killed while trying to escape 1
 
0.7% Victim accidentally killed in custody 1
 

Victim presented before judge/magistrate

4.2% Yes 6
 
 
59.9% No 85

Enforced Disappearances vs. Extrajudicial Executions 

Classification

63.4% Extrajudicial executions 90
 
 
36.6% Enforced disappearances 52

Number of victims per family

81.0% 1 victim 115
 
14.1% 2 victim 20
 
2.8% 3 victim 4
 
2.1% 4 victim 3
 

Related incidents

4.9% Genuine encounters in family 7
 
 
93.7% No genuine encounters in family 133

Body Disposal 

Security forces returned body

6.3% Yes 9
 
1.4% Yes, but forced immediate cremation 2
 
55.6% No 79
 

Body disposal by security forces

15.5% Cremated the body 22
 
0.7% Dumped body in canal or river 1
 

Condition of corpse, if known

5.6% Bullet wounds 8
 
3.5% Other 5
 
1.4% Missing fingernails 2
 
0.7% Bruises 1
 
0.7% Cuts/wounds 1
 
0.7% Missing hair from head or face 1
 

Security Forces Implicated 

Names of involved security officials known

45.1% Yes 64
 
 
20.4% No 29

Security forces uniformed

77.5% Yes 79
 
 
8.8% No 9

Type(s) of security forces involved in abduction

77.5% Punjab Police 110
 
5.6% CRPF 8
 
4.2% Criminal Investigation Agency 6
 
2.8% Other 4
 
1.4% Cat 2
 
0.7% BSF 1
 
0.7% Army 1
 

Type(s) of security forces involved in extrajudicial execution

62.7% Punjab police 89
 
2.8% Criminal Investigation Agency 4
 
2.1% CRPF 3
 
2.1% Cat 3
 
0.7% Army 1
 

Militancy Involvement 

Militant status

27.5% Militant 39
 
 
70.4% Non-militant 100

Non-militant, provided support to militants

12.7% Yes 18
 
 
52.1% No 74

If provided support, support was voluntary

11.3% Yes 16
 
 
1.4% No 2

Remedies & Impact 

Approached court or commission

20.4% Yes 29
 
 
79.6% No 113

Approached security officials

53.5% Yes 76
 
 
46.5% No 66

Reason the family did not pursue any kind of action

62.7% Afraid of retaliation 89
 
32.4% Didn’t know what to do 46
 
31.0% Couldn’t afford 44
 
20.4% Believed it would have been ineffective 29
 
1.4% Other 2
 
0.7% Not applicable 1
 

Remedies desired from government

88.0% Truth commission 125
 
64.1% Investigations into abuses 91
 
57.7% Employment 82
 
54.2% Monetary compensation to family 77
 
32.4% Public acknowledgement of wrongful deaths 46
 
32.4% Criminal sanctions against those responsible 46
 
20.4% Rehabilitation services to family members 29
 
9.2% Memorial for victims 13
 
2.8% Desire nothing from government 4
 

Year & District 

District

100.0% Bathinda 142
 

Year

0.0% 1981 0
 
0.0% 1982 0
 
0.0% 1983 0
 
0.0% 1984 0
 
0.7% 1985 1
 
0.7% 1986 1
 
1.4% 1987 2
 
1.4% 1988 2
 
2.1% 1989 3
 
6.3% 1990 9
 
23.2% 1991 33
 
29.6% 1992 42
 
14.8% 1993 21
 
0.7% 1994 1
 
0.7% 1995 1
 
0.7% 1996 1
 
0.0% 1997 0
 
0.0% 1998 0
 
0.0% 1999 0
 
0.0% 2000 0
 
0.0% 2001 0
 
0.0% 2002 0
 
0.0% 2003 0
 
0.0% 2004 0
 
0.7% 2005 1
 
0.0% 2006 0
 
0.0% 2007 0
 
0.0% 2012 0
 
16.9% Year Unknown 24