Patiala

Boundaries based on the 2001 census. Read about our methodology.


113 documented cases in Patiala District


Key statistics for documented cases in Patiala District

Victim Demographics 

Gender

93.8% Male 106
 
 
6.2% Female 7

Marital status

40.7% Not married 46
 
 
58.4% Married 66

If married, did the victim have children?

50.4% Yes 57
 
 
7.1% No 8


Total children surviving victims: 158


Religion

100.0% Sikh 113
 

Caste

66.4% Jat 75
 
 
32.7% Non-Jat 37

Age

8.0% 0-17 9
 
68.1% 18-33 77
 
13.3% 34-49 15
 
8.0% 50-64 9
 
1.8% 65+ 2
 
0.9% Age unknown 1
 

Education

23.0% No education 26
 
9.7% Primary school 11
 
15.0% Middle school 17
 
36.3% High school 41
 
2.7% Some college 3
 
7.1% College degree 8
 
2.7% Graduate degree 3
 
2.7% Vocational degree 3
 

Employment

35.4% Farmer/agriculture 40
 
14.2% Student 16
 
10.6% Day labourer 12
 
6.2% Driver (bus/truck/car) 7
 
5.3% Housewife 6
 
2.7% Unemployed 3
 
1.8% Shopkeeper 2
 
0.9% Mechanic 1
 
0.9% Carpenter 1
 
27.4% Other 31
 

Urban / Rural

82.3% Rural 93
 
 
17.7% Urban 20

Abduction, Detention, & Torture 

Prior detentions

54.0% Yes 61
 
 
44.2% No 50

Prior torture

48.7% Yes 55
 
 
5.3% No 6

Abduction preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

78.8% Yes 89
 
 
18.6% No 21

Security officials informed witnesses where they were taking the victim

13.3% Yes 8
 
 
70.0% No 42

Witnesses to abduction

53.1% Yes 60
 
 
8.0% No 9

Victim abduction location

16.8% Victim’s residence 19
 
15.0% Roadside 17
 
5.3% Friend/relative's residence 6
 
5.3% Village fields 6
 
5.3% Police station 6
 
4.4% Shop/market 5
 
3.5% Bus station/stand 4
 
1.8% Checkpoint (naka) 2
 
12.4% Other 14
 

Detention facility type

Data forthcoming


Preceding detention location known

41.6% Yes 47
 
 
37.2% No 42

Witnesses to detention preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

Data forthcoming


Security official response to victim status

19.5% Denied involvement 22
 
14.2% Gave no response 16
 
10.6% Told family to go to another police station 12
 
7.1% Other 8
 
5.3% Victim had escaped 6
 
4.4% Killed victim in an “encounter” 5
 
1.8% Admitted extrajudicial execution with no explanation 2
 
0.9% Admitted custody only 1
 
0.9% Victim killed by militants 1
 

Victim presented before judge/magistrate

7.1% Yes 8
 
 
66.4% No 75

Enforced Disappearances vs. Extrajudicial Executions 

Classification

69.0% Extrajudicial executions 78
 
 
31.0% Enforced disappearances 35

Number of victims per family

74.3% 1 victim 84
 
14.2% 2 victim 16
 
5.3% 3 victim 6
 
6.2% 4 victim 7
 

Related incidents

3.5% Genuine encounters in family 4
 
 
94.7% No genuine encounters in family 107

Body Disposal 

Security forces returned body

21.2% Yes 24
 
4.4% Yes, but forced immediate cremation 5
 
42.5% No 48
 

Body disposal by security forces

11.5% Cremated the body 13
 
1.8% Dumped body in canal or river 2
 
0.9% Buried the body 1
 

Condition of corpse, if known

15.0% Bullet wounds 17
 
5.3% Bruises 6
 
5.3% Cuts/wounds 6
 
5.3% Other 6
 
3.5% Burn marks 4
 
1.8% Missing fingernails 2
 
0.9% Broken bones 1
 
0.9% Missing hair from head or face 1
 

Security Forces Implicated 

Names of involved security officials known

49.6% Yes 56
 
 
22.1% No 25

Security forces uniformed

76.7% Yes 46
 
 
20.0% No 12

Type(s) of security forces involved in abduction

65.5% Punjab Police 74
 
9.7% Criminal Investigation Agency 11
 
3.5% Other 4
 
1.8% CRPF 2
 
0.9% Cat 1
 

Type(s) of security forces involved in extrajudicial execution

56.6% Punjab police 64
 
8.0% Criminal Investigation Agency 9
 
2.7% Army 3
 
1.8% CRPF 2
 
0.9% Cat 1
 
0.9% Other 1
 

Militancy Involvement 

Militant status

35.4% Militant 40
 
 
57.5% Non-militant 65

Non-militant, provided support to militants

11.5% Yes 13
 
 
45.1% No 51

If provided support, support was voluntary

7.1% Yes 8
 
 
4.4% No 5

Remedies & Impact 

Approached court or commission

23.0% Yes 26
 
 
77.0% No 87

Approached security officials

48.7% Yes 55
 
 
51.3% No 58

Reason the family did not pursue any kind of action

71.7% Afraid of retaliation 81
 
26.5% Couldn’t afford 30
 
20.4% Didn’t know what to do 23
 
7.1% Believed it would have been ineffective 8
 
3.5% Not applicable 4
 
0.9% Other 1
 

Remedies desired from government

74.3% Truth commission 84
 
71.7% Monetary compensation to family 81
 
69.9% Employment 79
 
54.0% Criminal sanctions against those responsible 61
 
43.4% Investigations into abuses 49
 
24.8% Public acknowledgement of wrongful deaths 28
 
23.9% Memorial for victims 27
 
15.9% Rehabilitation services to family members 18
 
4.4% Desire nothing from government 5
 

Year & District 

District

100.0% Patiala 113
 

Year

0.0% 1981 0
 
0.0% 1982 0
 
3.5% 1983 4
 
1.8% 1984 2
 
0.0% 1985 0
 
0.9% 1986 1
 
1.8% 1987 2
 
3.5% 1988 4
 
1.8% 1989 2
 
9.7% 1990 11
 
20.4% 1991 23
 
21.2% 1992 24
 
20.4% 1993 23
 
4.4% 1994 5
 
1.8% 1995 2
 
0.0% 1996 0
 
0.0% 1997 0
 
0.0% 1998 0
 
0.0% 1999 0
 
0.0% 2000 0
 
0.0% 2001 0
 
0.0% 2002 0
 
0.0% 2003 0
 
0.0% 2004 0
 
0.0% 2005 0
 
0.0% 2006 0
 
0.0% 2007 0
 
0.0% 2012 0
 
8.8% Year Unknown 10