Sumedh Singh [Saini]

 

At least Enforced Disappearances/Extrajudicial Executions

The perpetrator profile of Sumedh S. Saini is the first of its kind to identify and visualize cases of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions reportedly committed under his command during his tenure as Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) in various jurisdictions of Punjab. Notably, the data equally highlights Saini’s failure to protect the populace from gross human rights violations. He not only permitted his subordinates and other security forces to perpetrate violations against residents in his assigned jurisdictions, but he also allowed them to travel extra-territorially to target individuals.

S. S. Saini served at the rank of SSP, or district chief, in at least seven jurisdictions in as many years. The number of cases presented here is an undercounting of the likely cases perpetrated under his command. These cases draw from Ensaaf’s interviews with family members of the victims and other witnesses, and present the information provided by them. This number excludes all cases where complete incident dates or locations were not available. Without this information, it is difficult to ascertain whether those incidents occurred under S. S. Saini’s command.

The number further excludes cases where we have not yet established certain jurisdictional boundaries for his postings, as some district borders changed after his tenure. It further excludes cases committed under any other rank he held, higher or lower, other than the rank of SSP, or district police chief. This data also excludes cases of individuals who were arbitrarily detained or tortured by him or officials under his command.

We will update the number of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions reported under his command, as we receive more information. To a large extent, however, this information and the complete truth rests with the government of India.


Command History

Unless otherwise noted, Sumedh S. Saini’s command history draws from the following sources: (1) the annual Civil List of the Indian Police Service (IPS) for the Punjab cadre, prepared by the Ministry of Home Affairs, naming the position and date of posting of the senior police official as of January 1 of that year for 1983 to 1996, and (2) the individual websites of Punjab’s police districts, listing the names of Senior Superintendents of Police (SSP) and their dates of tenure. This information draws from publicly available records/sources; the complete account of S. S. Saini’s official postings and activities lies with the government of India.

  • SSP Firozpur, June 28, 1987 — April 18, 1988


  • Awarded President's Police Medal of Gallantry in 1987

  • SSP Batala, April 19, 1988 – July 31, 1988


  • SSP Ludhiana, August 1, 1988 – February 4, 1990


  • SSP Bathinda, February 5, 1990 – April 28, 1990


  • Most likely SSP Kapurthala, April 29, 1990 – July 17, 1990
    (Because this posting falls in the middle of the year, it is not reported in the IPS Civil List. Further, Kapurthala has not provided any information online regarding its historical postings. The daily newspaper Tribune also did not name the SSP Kapurthala during the above time period. We have inferred that Saini was posted in Kapurthala using the process of elimination to determine the SSPs of all other districts during that time frame.)


  • SSP Hoshiarpur, July 17, 1990 – December 20, 1990


  • SSP Chandigarh December 21, 1990 – January 3, 1993
    (Technically on Deputation to Government of India, as SSP Chandigarh, because Chandigarh is a Union Territory.) The Punjab Governor and others decided to remove Saini from this position due to police abuse of an Army official. Ensaaf has not yet incorporated/included data from Chandigarh on its data visualization site; it is forthcoming.


  • Assistant to the Inspector General, January 15, 1993 to September 28, 1993: According to articles in the Tribune on January 17 and September 29, Sumedh Saini held, at least, the posts of AIG (Personnel) and AIG (Administration) during this time period.

  • SSP/Police Commissioner Ludhiana, September 30, 1993 – June 19, 1994 (The IPS Civil List describes this posting as SSP, whereas the Tribune reported this position as the newly created Commissioner of Police of Ludhiana. The Ludhiana police website lists a non-cadre Punjab Police Service official as SSP.)


Personal Participation
  • cases directly implicating Sumedh Singh in abduction, disappearance, and/or killing


Known Promotions

The government of India consistently promoted S. S. Saini throughout his career to the highest ranks of Punjab Police, including the top post of Director General of Police. It also rewarded S.S. Saini in 1987 with the President's Medal of Gallantry. He is now retired from IPS service, and has repeatedly escaped accountability.

  • DIG Admn. (CPO), Punjab, Chandigarh (ORP), June 20, 1994

  • Inspector General of Police, on September 5, 2005, reported to currently be IG, Economic Offences

  • Inspector General of Police, Vigilance, March 8, 2007

  • Additional Director General of Police-Cum-Chief Dir., Vigilance Bureau, Pb, Chg., February 16, 2009

  • Director General of Police, Punjab, March 15, 2012 - October 25, 2015

  • Director General of Police-Cum-Chairman, Police Housing Corporation, October 26, 2015 (date of retirement June 20, 2018)

Disciplinary Proceedings / Legal Cases
Beating and Illegal Detention of Lt. Col. R. Vats: Tribune, January 3, 1993, “Charges being framed against Saini,” “Saini to be reverted,” and “Charges against SSP Saini”
Disappearances of Ashok Kumar (Walia), Vinod Kumar (Walia), and Mukhtiar Singh: A week after Vinod Kumar and his brother filed a harassment suit against SSP Sumedh Saini, he, his brother-in-law, and their driver disappeared.
Tribune, March 10, 1994: “Warrants against SSP for contempt”
Tribune, March 16, 1994: “Judge to probe charges against SSP”
Tribune, March 18, 1994: “HC: produce missing men today”
Tribune, March 19, 1994: “Monday new deadline to trace men”
Tribune, March 23, 1994: “Verdict reserved in Saini case”
Tribune, May 19, 1995: “Probe report in 3 months: CBI”
Tribune, August 25, 1995: “Missing business man untraced”
Tribune, August 31, 1995: “CBI blames Saini, three others”
Tribune, September 12, 1995: “Verdict in Saini case on Sept 14”
Tribune, September 15, 1995: “Saini cleared of contempt”

Other reports and articles

Key statistics of cases directly implicating Sumedh Singh [Saini]:

Victim Demographics 

Gender

88.9% Male 24
 
 
11.1% Female 3

Marital status

81.5% Not married 22
 
 
18.5% Married 5

If married, did the victim have children?

14.8% Yes 4
 


Total children surviving victims: 12


Religion

100.0% Sikh 27
 

Caste

63.0% Jat 17
 
 
37.0% Non-Jat 10

Age

14.8% 0-17 4
 
77.8% 18-33 21
 
3.7% 34-49 1
 
3.7% 65+ 1
 

Education

7.4% No education 2
 
11.1% Primary school 3
 
11.1% Middle school 3
 
25.9% High school 7
 
7.4% Some college 2
 
18.5% College degree 5
 
11.1% Graduate degree 3
 
7.4% Vocational degree 2
 

Employment

25.9% Student 7
 
14.8% Farmer/agriculture 4
 
11.1% Shopkeeper 3
 
7.4% Driver (bus/truck/car) 2
 
7.4% Unemployed 2
 
3.7% Mechanic 1
 
3.7% Housewife 1
 
25.9% Other 7
 

Urban / Rural

74.1% Rural 20
 
 
18.5% Urban 5

Abduction, Detention, & Torture 

Prior detentions

66.7% Yes 18
 
 
33.3% No 9

Prior torture

55.6% Yes 15
 
 
11.1% No 3

Abduction preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

74.1% Yes 20
 
 
25.9% No 7

Security officials informed witnesses where they were taking the victim

14.3% Yes 2
 
 
92.9% No 13

Witnesses to abduction

51.9% Yes 14
 
 
11.1% No 3

Victim abduction location

25.9% Roadside 7
 
7.4% Victim’s residence 2
 
7.4% Bus station/stand 2
 
7.4% Police station 2
 
3.7% Checkpoint (naka) 1
 
14.8% Other 4
 

Detention facility type

Data forthcoming


Preceding detention location known

44.4% Yes 12
 
 
25.9% No 7

Witnesses to detention preceding enforced disappearance/extrajudicial execution

Data forthcoming


Security official response to victim status

7.4% Gave no response 2
 
3.7% Killed victim in an “encounter” 1
 
3.7% Told family to go to another police station 1
 
3.7% Other 1
 

Victim presented before judge/magistrate

3.7% Yes 1
 
 
48.1% No 13

Enforced Disappearances vs. Extrajudicial Executions 

Classification

96.3% Extrajudicial executions 26
 
 
3.7% Enforced disappearances 1

Number of victims per family

85.2% 1 victim 23
 
3.7% 2 victim 1
 
11.1% 3 victim 3
 

Related incidents

11.1% Genuine encounters in family 3
 
 
88.9% No genuine encounters in family 24

Body Disposal 

Security forces returned body

29.6% Yes 8
 
3.7% Yes, but forced immediate cremation 1
 
63.0% No 17
 

Body disposal by security forces

44.4% Cremated the body 12
 

Condition of corpse, if known

29.6% Bullet wounds 8
 
14.8% Burn marks 4
 
3.7% Bruises 1
 
3.7% Cuts/wounds 1
 
3.7% Missing hair from head or face 1
 
3.7% Missing fingernails 1
 
3.7% Other 1
 

Security Forces Implicated 

Names of involved security officials known

100.0% Yes 27
 
 
0.0% No 0

Security forces uniformed

92.9% Yes 13
 
 
0.0% No 0

Type(s) of security forces involved in abduction

63.0% Punjab Police 17
 
22.2% Other 6
 
7.4% BSF 2
 
3.7% CRPF 1
 

Type(s) of security forces involved in extrajudicial execution

70.4% Punjab police 19
 
33.3% Other 9
 
18.5% Cat 5
 
11.1% CRPF 3
 

Militancy Involvement 

Militant status

59.3% Militant 16
 
 
40.7% Non-militant 11

Non-militant, provided support to militants

3.7% Yes 1
 
 
33.3% No 9

If provided support, support was voluntary

3.7% Yes 1
 
 
0.0% No 0

Remedies & Impact 

Approached court or commission

22.2% Yes 6
 
 
77.8% No 21

Approached security officials

22.2% Yes 6
 
 
74.1% No 20

Reason the family did not pursue any kind of action

59.3% Afraid of retaliation 16
 
29.6% Didn’t know what to do 8
 
18.5% Not applicable 5
 
18.5% Believed it would have been ineffective 5
 
18.5% Couldn’t afford 5
 

Remedies desired from government

70.4% Monetary compensation to family 19
 
59.3% Employment 16
 
55.6% Truth commission 15
 
48.1% Criminal sanctions against those responsible 13
 
37.0% Rehabilitation services to family members 10
 
37.0% Public acknowledgement of wrongful deaths 10
 
37.0% Investigations into abuses 10
 
25.9% Memorial for victims 7
 
7.4% Desire nothing from government 2
 

Year & District 

District

3.7% Bathinda 1
 
3.7% Fatehgarh Sahib 1
 
33.3% Gurdaspur 9
 
3.7% Jalandhar 1
 
7.4% Kapurthala 2
 
11.1% Ludhiana 3
 
3.7% Nawanshahr 1
 
25.9% Rupnagar 7
 
7.4% Location Withheld 2
 

Year

0.0% 1981 0
 
0.0% 1982 0
 
0.0% 1983 0
 
0.0% 1984 0
 
0.0% 1985 0
 
11.1% 1986 3
 
11.1% 1987 3
 
18.5% 1988 5
 
22.2% 1989 6
 
0.0% 1990 0
 
33.3% 1991 9
 
3.7% 1992 1
 
0.0% 1993 0
 
0.0% 1994 0
 
0.0% 1995 0
 
0.0% 1996 0
 
0.0% 1997 0
 
0.0% 1998 0
 
0.0% 1999 0
 
0.0% 2000 0
 
0.0% 2001 0
 
0.0% 2002 0
 
0.0% 2003 0
 
0.0% 2004 0
 
0.0% 2005 0
 
0.0% 2006 0
 
0.0% 2007 0
 
0.0% 2012 0
 
0.0% Year Unknown 0